AI Policy & Governance
Checks whether ownership, approval paths, risk appetite, and policy coverage are defined.
Free AI governance readiness assessment
Find the policy, vendor risk, model risk, reporting, and evidence gaps your next exam, audit, or board meeting may expose.
No account required. Responses are not stored on our servers.
Sample Readiness Snapshot
Board-ready output
42
of 60
Maturity band
Developing
Program elements are in place, but evidence and oversight artifacts need tightening before review.
Top gaps to prioritize
Built by practitioners
Grant spent years inside compliance and risk functions at financial institutions — navigating model risk management, vendor due diligence, and emerging AI governance with frameworks built for large banks and budgets built for community institutions. AegisAI was built to close that gap.
Every assessment, template, and tracker on this platform traces directly to the regulatory frameworks your examiners use: SR 26-2, OCC Bulletin 2026-13, FFIEC interagency guidance, and the NIST AI RMF.
“Every CCO I spoke to said the same thing: we know we need to act on AI governance, but we don't have the bandwidth to build it from scratch. AegisAI is the answer to that — practical frameworks, evidence-ready templates, and assessments built for the way financial institution examiners think.”
Your institution may already have AI exposure through vendor products, internal pilots, employee use of public tools, model enhancements, and automated decisioning. Regulators, auditors, and boards will ask who owns AI risk, which use cases are approved, how vendors are reviewed, how models are monitored, and where the evidence lives.
The assessment produces a readiness score, maturity band, domain view, and prioritized gap summary your team can use to focus remediation.
Start the 5-Minute AssessmentAI Governance Readiness Report
Sample output shown for illustration.
Overall AI Governance Readiness Score
42
/ 60
Prioritized gap summary
| Top Gap 1 | AI vendor inventory is incomplete |
|---|---|
| Top Gap 2 | Board reporting cadence is not defined |
| Top Gap 3 | Evidence ownership is unclear |
Six domain maturity view
7/10
5/10
6/10
7/10
6/10
5/10
Six domains that reveal whether AI governance is ready for scrutiny.
Checks whether ownership, approval paths, risk appetite, and policy coverage are defined.
Assesses whether AI embedded in vendor tools is inventoried, reviewed, and monitored.
Reviews how AI and model-related use cases are validated, monitored, challenged, and documented.
Looks at data use, privacy, explainability, fairness, and customer-impact controls.
Evaluates whether leadership receives useful reporting on AI risks, gaps, and remediation progress.
Checks whether the institution can produce the documentation needed for audit, board, or examiner review.
It is designed for fast internal orientation, not a months-long readiness project.
Answer 30 practical questions across six AI governance domains.
See your score, maturity band, and domain-level results immediately.
Use the gap summary to prioritize remediation and board-ready follow-up.
The output is useful across second-line, audit, vendor oversight, and leadership reporting conversations.
The assessment is designed to let buyers see the score and gap summary without creating an account or sending responses to a server.
No account is required to start. Your responses are not stored on our servers. Results are generated from your answers and saved locally in your browser so you can view your score and gap summary.
The calculator is aligned to current model risk governance expectations, including SR 26-2 / OCC Bulletin 2026-13, with SR 11-7 mapping retained for continuity. It is not legal advice.
Preview the 6-Domain MethodologyAfter the score, higher-value resources can help teams turn gaps into policy updates, board materials, vendor review tasks, and evidence ownership.
Template packs map to common gaps such as AI policy, vendor diligence, model governance, board reporting, security controls, and AI incident response.
Browse TemplatesThe planned tracker helps assign evidence owners, due dates, status, and documentation needed for review.
Common questions from financial services teams before they start.
About 5 minutes. It includes 30 questions across six AI governance domains.
No. You can complete the assessment without creating an account.
No. Assessment responses are not stored on our servers. Results are generated from your answers and saved locally in your browser.
No. The assessment is an educational and planning tool. It is not legal, regulatory, audit, or supervisory advice.
The assessment is designed for banks, credit unions, fintechs, and regulated financial services teams working on AI governance, model risk, vendor risk, compliance, audit, and board reporting.
You receive an overall readiness score, domain-level results, and a prioritized gap summary. Optional follow-up resources may include a board-ready PDF, templates, or evidence tracking tools.
Get a free readiness score and a practical gap summary without creating an account.
No account required. Responses are not stored on our servers.